Re: logfile rotation

Tom Lane wrote:

>I'll repeat what I said in response to your other posting:
>  
>
Hm? I never posted something with shared mem usage before, what do you mean?

>This uses a shared memory area with no lock, which seems a bad design;
>  
>

AFAICS there should be no lock necessary.


>We agreed long ago that the
>postmaster should never depend on the correctness of any shared memory
>data structure; but this patch would make it do so.
>  
>
I understand that, so what's the suggested way to store data common for 
all backends?

Regards,
Andreas