Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type
Дата
Msg-id 407d949e0907291007p6817d4e1u91b964fe7a16ec2a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: date_part()/EXTRACT(second) behaviour with time data type  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I agree that we should change it, but should we back-patch it, and if so
> how far?
>

Well at least to 8.4 so someone who has just always been using
downloaded binaries or binaries compiled with the default
configuration continues to get the same behaviour.

My inclination would be to backpatch it further back. But I'm not 100%
sure either.

-- 
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: system timezone regression failure
Следующее
От: decibel
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Higher TOAST compression.