Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I agree that we should change it, but should we back-patch it, and if so
>> how far?
> Well at least to 8.4 so someone who has just always been using
> downloaded binaries or binaries compiled with the default
> configuration continues to get the same behaviour.
> My inclination would be to backpatch it further back. But I'm not 100%
> sure either.
Given the lack of prior complaints, I'm thinking just to 8.4 is a good
compromise. Any objections out there?
regards, tom lane