My point was Peter originally wasn't complaining about vaporware, it was
about pimping commercial sponsors, at least how I read it.
Gavin
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Gavin M. Roy wrote:
>
>
>
>>If it's a substantial contribution, which some would argue that Nested
>>Transactions alone is, and it's not vapor-ware, whats the problem with
>>that?
>>
>>
>
>the fact that it *is* vapor-ware right now is the problem ... the code
>hasn't been written, its been contracted out to *be* written ... sometime
>in the future ...
>
> >
>
>
>>Gavin
>>
>>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>News approved. Will appear in next site build.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Oh, so everytime someone pays someone to develop a PostgreSQL feature,
>>>it's a news item? I'll have to remember that...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, World Wide Web Owner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>A new entry has been added to the news database.
>>>>>
>>>>>Database Admin: http://www.postgresql.org/admin/edit_news.php?179
>>>>>
>>>>>Submitted by: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
>>>>>Headline: Fujitsu Funds PostgreSQL Features
>>>>>Summary:
>>>>>
>>>>>Fujitsu is funding various PostgreSQL enhancements that will appear
>>>>>in future PostgreSQL releases.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>>>
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>>
>>
>>
>
>----
>Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
>Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>