If it's a substantial contribution, which some would argue that Nested
Transactions alone is, and it's not vapor-ware, whats the problem with that?
Gavin
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>
>
>>News approved. Will appear in next site build.
>>
>>
>
>Oh, so everytime someone pays someone to develop a PostgreSQL feature,
>it's a news item? I'll have to remember that...
>
>
>
>>On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, World Wide Web Owner wrote:
>>
>>
>>>A new entry has been added to the news database.
>>>
>>>Database Admin: http://www.postgresql.org/admin/edit_news.php?179
>>>
>>>Submitted by: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us
>>>Headline: Fujitsu Funds PostgreSQL Features
>>>Summary:
>>>
>>>Fujitsu is funding various PostgreSQL enhancements that will appear
>>>in future PostgreSQL releases.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>