Zahid Khan <khanzahid235@yahoo.com> writes:
> I see one behavior change is PG8.3 and PG 8.2 .I was getting error of underflow value in PG8.2 when i
> tried to insert '1E-307' in double precision column .And my
> application was expecting the same error condition with the same
> values against PG 8.3.3 as well.but now this vaule is inserted successfully.I was thinking is this expected ,or was
brokenin PG 8.2 ?
It's not particularly surprising; we now allow denormalized numbers if
the platform supports them.
regards, tom lane