Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mark Dilger
Тема Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Дата
Msg-id 405A7844-BD85-4D2E-AA1E-7073DC6A6F62@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers

> On Dec 7, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I'm not entirely following ... are you suggesting that each released minor
> version needs to be kept buildable separately?

No.  I'm just wondering if we want to share the product of such efforts if anybody (me, for instance) volunteers to do
itfor some subset of minor releases.  For my heap corruption checking work, I might want to be able to build a small
numberof old minor releases that I know had corruption bugs. 

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company






В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump versus ancient server versions
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why doesn't pgstat_report_analyze() focus on not-all-visible-page dead tuple counts, specifically?