Re: Slony-I makes progress

Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
> I personally don't think that a GUI tool should be the province of the Slony 
> project.  Seriously.   I think that Slony should focus on a command-line api 
> and catalogs, and allow the existing GUI projects to build a slony-supporting 
> interface.

Why a command line api? I believe it would make sense to be able 
to configure and control all nodes of the entire system from psql 
connected to any of the nodes. That would also facilitate the 
existing GUI projects in adding a Slony-manager.

Jochem

-- 
I don't get it
immigrants don't work
and steal our jobs    - Loesje