Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Are those exposed through the libpq interface?
>>>
>>> No, because libpq doesn't really have any concept of prepared statements.
>>> It would probably make sense to add some more API to libpq to allow
>>> creation and interrogation of prepared statements, but no one's got
>>> around to that yet.
>
>> Uh, if libpq doesn't know about it, how is that information accessed?
>
> That's exactly the problem...
Currently the only way to do that would be to have a user defined
function that calls SPI_prepare() with the query string and returns the
desired information to the client.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #