Jan Wieck wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> Tom Lane wrote:
> >>>> Are those exposed through the libpq interface?
> >>>
> >>> No, because libpq doesn't really have any concept of prepared statements.
> >>> It would probably make sense to add some more API to libpq to allow
> >>> creation and interrogation of prepared statements, but no one's got
> >>> around to that yet.
> >
> >> Uh, if libpq doesn't know about it, how is that information accessed?
> >
> > That's exactly the problem...
>
> Currently the only way to do that would be to have a user defined
> function that calls SPI_prepare() with the query string and returns the
> desired information to the client.
It was my understanding that the new protocol passes this information to
the cilent, right?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073