Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> There's a minor problem here, though - these stats were collected before
> we fixed the tlist issue, so hashagg was spilling about 10x the amount
> of data compared to sort+groupagg. So maybe that's the first thing we
> should do, before contemplating changes to the costing - collecting
> fresh data. I can do that, if needed.

+1.  I'm not sure if we still need to do anything, but we definitely
can't tell on the basis of data that doesn't reliably reflect what
the code does now.

            regards, tom lane