On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> I am concerned that knowledge of this new read-only replication user
> would have to be spread all over the backend code, which is really not
> something we should be doing at this stage in 8.5 development. I am
> also thinking such a special user might fall out of work on mandatory
> access control, so maybe we should just require super-user for 8.5 and
> revisit this for 8.6.
OK. I leave that code as it is. If the majority feel it's overkill to
require a superuser privilege when authenticating the standby, we can
just drop it later.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center