On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> However, wouldn't it make more logical sense to replace "host/hostssl"
> with "replication/replicationssl" rather than overload the database
> field?
Seems good. How about the following formats?
replication user CIDR-address auth-method [auth-options] replicationssl user CIDR-address auth-method
[auth-options]replication user IP-address IP-mask auth-method [auth-options] replicationssl user IP-address
IP-mask auth-method [auth-options]
Note that "database" field has been removed since it's useless
for replication.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center