Tom Lane wrote:
>Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>
>
>>but my BSD/OS manual only documents 'cp -R' and mentions:
>>I think we should switch to -R in our code.
>>
>>
>
>And break the code on who knows how many other systems? No thanks.
>
>If we want to do anything at all with this code, we should eliminate the
>use of system("cp") entirely in favor of doing the recursive copy logic
>ourselves. We already have the beginnings of same in the Windows port,
>and I think we'll be forced down that path anyway for tablespaces.
>
>
>
That seems cleaner to me.
IIRC we don't copy anything but plain files and directories - no special
files, symlinks or fifos, so the -R/-r differences shouldn't affect us
anyway, should they? Also, that should make the implementation of an
internal recursive copy much simpler - far fewer cases to consider.
cheers
andrew