Christopher Browne wrote:
>The world rejoiced as mendola@bigfoot.com (Gaetano Mendola) wrote:
>
>
>>I think is a good Idea put a fflush after:
>>
>>fprintf(LOGOUTPUT, "[%s] %s\n", timebuffer, logentry);
>>
>>
>
>I thought I had put fflush()es at all the interesting locations...
>
>
I just looked through the code, I think there are fflush()es at all but
one interesting locations. The last log_entry call before sleeping
doesn't have an fflush call after it. I'll submit a patch that adds it.
>Apparently it was an error to not go to the effort of making sure it
>worked well on FreeBSD. (It was on my list, but I never got the Round
>Tuits...) There's an AMD-64 box coming in soon, targeted at FreeBSD,
>so that should change...
>
>
Yeah, FreeBSD testing would have been nice, but I don't have access to
any FreeBSD boxes so.....