Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mike Mascari
Тема Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Дата
Msg-id 3FB96F06.7000205@mascari.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Список pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Hello,
>
>   If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be
> appropriate.

It might be interesting to track Oracle's version number viz. its
feature list. IOW, a PostgreSQL 8.0 database would be feature
equivalent to an Oracle 8.0 database. That would mean:

1) PITR
2) Distributed Tx
3) Replication
4) Nested Tx
5) PL/SQL Exception Handling

IMHO, a major version number jump should at least match the delta in
features one finds in the commercial segment with their major version
number bumps. Otherwise, I suspect it would be viewed as window
dressing...

Could be wrong, though...

Mike Mascari
mascarm@mascari.com





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Release cycle length
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Release cycle length