Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Joshua D. Drake
Тема
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171546330.6852-100000@hosting.commandprompt.com
Ответ на
Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? (Josh Berkus)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Hello,

  If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be
appropriate.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> Of course, while I was editing press releases at 2am, I started thinking about 
> our next version.   It seems certain that the next release, in 6-9 months, 
> will have at a minimum the Windows port and ARC, if not Slony-I as well.
> 
> Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0?    Seems like 
> even 7.4 is hardly recognizable as the same database as 7.0.
> 
> I'm posting this to both Advocacy and Hackers because I think that some people 
> will have rather different points of view on the issue.   But I wanted to 
> start a discussion early this time.  No flamewars, please!   We all want 
> PostgreSQL to be the best possible database.
> 
> 

-- 
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
От: William Yu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
FAQ