Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
От
Joshua D. Drake
Тема
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Дата
Msg-id
Pine.LNX.4.44.0311171546330.6852-100000@hosting.commandprompt.com
Ответ на
Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? (Josh Berkus)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
Hello, If Win32 actually makes it into 7.5 then yes I believe 8.0 would be appropriate. Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Josh Berkus wrote: > Folks, > > Of course, while I was editing press releases at 2am, I started thinking about > our next version. It seems certain that the next release, in 6-9 months, > will have at a minimum the Windows port and ARC, if not Slony-I as well. > > Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0? Seems like > even 7.4 is hardly recognizable as the same database as 7.0. > > I'm posting this to both Advocacy and Hackers because I think that some people > will have rather different points of view on the issue. But I wanted to > start a discussion early this time. No flamewars, please! We all want > PostgreSQL to be the best possible database. > > -- Co-Founder Command Prompt, Inc. The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления