Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
От | Robert Treat |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1069162785.10334.7158.camel@camel обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Maybe the criteria for 8.0 should be in place upgrades... that would be a major shift in the landscape of PostgreSQL... Robert Treat On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 21:20, Christopher Browne wrote: > Oops! josh@agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) was seen spray-painting on a wall: > > Given all that, don't people think it's time to jump to 8.0? Seems > > like even 7.4 is hardly recognizable as the same database as 7.0. > > If wishes were fishes... Shouldn't we see what interesting features > actually _do_ make it in? > > If Win32 support does get ready, and we get recursive queries (I'll > point out different TODO items :-)) and Slony-1, PITR, and cache > improvements make it in, then perhaps it's time to call it 8.0. A > "cvs update -Pd" doesn't get me that yet, so it seems early. > > I'd _almost_ buy the story that 7.4 should have been called 8.0, > although that _didn't_ happen because it 'just missed' PITR and Win32. > > The amusing approach would be to jump straight to 8.1 :-). > -- > wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','acm.org'). > http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/postgresql.html > ..you could spend *all day* customizing the title bar. Believe me. I > speak from experience." -- Matt Welsh > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your > joining column's datatypes do not match -- Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: