Jan Wieck wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>>> See attached regression.diffs.
>>
>> Looks like Jan forgot to update this expected file to match his changes.
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>
> Not exactly,
>
> I didn't run the parallel regression test and thus missed that rules and
> foreign_key are in the same group and that the execution of the latter
> now affects the result of the former.
>
> I'll try to fix it by moving the test into rule.sql (it's placed there
> as wrong as it's in foreign_key). If that doesn't work either I will
> back it out as we don't want bigger regression test rearrangements at
> this stage in the release cycle.
The test is now in rule.sql.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #