Re: comments on casts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: comments on casts
Дата
Msg-id 3F8B9C56.5050000@familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: comments on casts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: comments on casts  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: comments on casts  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> regression=# select oid from pg_cast;
>   oid
> -------
>  16420
>  16421
>  16422
>  16423
>  16424
>  ... etc ...
> 
> It would be a very serious design error if pg_cast didn't have OIDs,
> because then pg_cast entries couldn't have dependency entries in
> pg_depend.

OK.  Weird.  I could have _sworn_ I tried that and I didn't get an OID 
column.  Oh well - makes things a lot easier.

Also, with the pg_largeobject table, there seems to be no 'owner' 
concept on lobs at all.  So is there no problem with any random gumby 
commenting on anyone else's large object?

Chris




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: comments on casts
Следующее
От: "Peter Galbavy"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2-phase commit