Re: 2-phase commit

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> > The simplest senario(though there could be varations) is
> 
> > [At participant(master)'s side]
> >   Because the commit operations is done, does nothing.
> 
> > [At coordinator(slave)' side]
> >    1) After a while
> >    2) re-establish the communication path between the
> >       partcipant(master)'s TM.
> >    3) resend the "commit requeset" to the participant's TM.
> >   1)2)3) would be repeated until the coordinator receives
> >   the "commit ok" message from the partcipant.
> 
> [ scratches head ] I think you are using the terms "master" and "slave"
> oppositely than I would.

Oops my mistake, sorry. 
But is it 2-phase commit protocol in the first place ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inouehttp://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/