On 30 Aug 2003 at 16:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Dan Langille writes:
>
> > I've started. I'm wondering how much we need to cover here and how
> > much can be delegated to other sections of the documentation. Before
> > I get very far into this, I want to get some ideas as to what we
> > need.
>
> If you intend this to go into the main documentation, then I think we
> don't need anything, because everything is already documented in its
> proper place.
It has already been decided that we need something. Hence the
request for someone to write it and my start on the task.
> What you wrote is basically just a summary of various
> system aspects that might have to do with that vague word "security",
> together with pointers to the places where they are documented (which
> reinforces my point).
Your point being that we don't need anything more than we already
have? That conflicts with what has already been decided.
> Perhaps a "howto" format that you can post on
> techdocs might be more appropriate for you.
I'm not sure what you mean by "for you".
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/