Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0308301612470.1118-100000@peter.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc? ("Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] What goes into the security doc?
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Dan Langille writes: > I've started. I'm wondering how much we need to cover here and how > much can be delegated to other sections of the documentation. Before > I get very far into this, I want to get some ideas as to what we > need. If you intend this to go into the main documentation, then I think we don't need anything, because everything is already documented in its proper place. What you wrote is basically just a summary of various system aspects that might have to do with that vague word "security", together with pointers to the places where they are documented (which reinforces my point). Perhaps a "howto" format that you can post on techdocs might be more appropriate for you. -- Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: