Re: How to prevent vacuum and reindex from deadlocking.
| От | Dennis Gearon |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How to prevent vacuum and reindex from deadlocking. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3F3A586D.70505@cvc.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: How to prevent vacuum and reindex from deadlocking. (Robert Creager <Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
In general, the documentation is not direct. When it is, it often is using database theory language, masters level databaseengineer language. Robert Creager wrote: > On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:13:59 -0700 > Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net> said something like: > > >>Postgres itself doesn't support nested transactions. >> > > > Yea, I just convinced myself of that. The first time I read the docs, that's > what I thought. Then I convinced myself when I re-read them that it was just a > warning, and a new transaction was started. But I just tried it, and they're > not... > > Thanks for point that out to me. I dare say that the BEGIN documentation is > unclear to me, even knowing what I know now. Why not just explictly say "Nested > transactions are not supported", rather than "... The current transaction is > not affected". Alright, maybe I still read at Junior High level. > > Cheers, > Rob >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: