Can we define the actual problem?
Does it have to do with NEW and OLD with UNIONS?
Or is it simply any conditional rule using UNION/EXCEPT/INTERSECT/...?
I ask because I'm confused by Tom's examples of failures.
Tom Lane wrote:
Dmitry Tkach <dmitry@openratings.com> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Dmitry Tkach <dmitry@openratings.com> writes:
It would have saved a lot of trouble if it just complained about that
union thing right away and refuse to create the rule...
That's what happens in CVS tip.
I thought you said it was only complaining about references to new and
old, not about *any* union clause...
I don't see a need to reject "any" union clause. AFAIK the cases that
don't work are just the ones where NEW or OLD are referenced.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org