Re: [HACKERS] Share state ( allocated memory ) across two C functions...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Share state ( allocated memory ) across two C functions...
Дата
Msg-id 3F00C64C.9020909@joeconway.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Share state ( allocated memory ) across two C functions...  ("Maksim Likharev" <mlikharev@aurigin.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Maksim Likharev wrote:
> Of cause I can return a handle from first function, pointer and accept
> that pointer in second function, but in this case I have to check
> that pointer on validity and so on...
>
> Is there any good practice ( some way to do so ) for that?
>

Best way I've come up with to do this is by using a hash table based on
a name lookup. See the way it's done in dblink now (as of a week or so
ago) for named persistent connections.

HTH,

Joe


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Maksim Likharev"
Дата:
Сообщение: Share state ( allocated memory ) across two C functions...
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pg_Dumpall error?