Under what circumstances does a character not take up a set number of
bytes? For example, i was under the impression that utf-8 allocated 6
bytes per character. While the character may not occupy all six bytes,
each byte would still be reserved for that character set.
Kris
>Juan Miguel writes:
>
>
>
>>Well ... but ... reading database theory books, you can see that fixed size
>>records are "better" than variant size records.
>>
>>
>
>Theory and practice are only the same in theory. In practice there is a
>difference.
>
>Anyway, char(30) means 30 characters, not 30 bytes. So it's not a
>fixed-size record anyway. Other factors are out-of-line storage and
>automatic compression of long values.
>
>
>