Re: Big 7.4 items
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Big 7.4 items |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DF9D3F9.18929.387ABB8@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Big 7.4 items (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Big 7.4 items
Re: Big 7.4 items |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13 Dec 2002 at 1:22, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Replication > > I have talked to Darren Johnson and I believe 7.4 is the time to > merge the Postgres-R source tree into our main CVS. Most of the > replication code will be in its own directory, with only minor > changes to our existing tree. They have single-master > replication working now, so we may have that feature in some > capacity for 7.4. I know others are working on replication > solutions. This is probably the time to decide for certain if > this is the direction we want to go for replication. Most who > have have studied Postgres-R feel it is the most promising > multi-master replication solution for reliably networked hosts. > > Comments? Some. 1) What kind of replication are we looking at? log file replay/syncnronous etc. If it is real time, like usogres( I hope I am in line with things here), that would be real good .Choice is always good.. 2 If we are going to have replication, can we have built in load balancing? Is it a good idea to have it in postgresql or a separate application would be way to go? And where are nested transactions? ByeShridhar -- Booker's Law: An ounce of application is worth a ton of abstraction.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: