Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
| От | Justin Clift |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3DEE0F26.20400@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments ("j.random.programmer" <javadesigner@yahoo.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Chris Boget wrote:
>>>4) The auto-increment ("serial") fields are very
>>>badly documented.
>>
>>since you came from the mysql world, this is understandable. mysql
>>doesn't have a "serial". it only has "autoincrement field." a
>>convenience, at best. not very flexible.
>
>
> What's the difference between the two? Autoincrement and serial?
> Unless I missed something in the docs, it didn't appear that there
> was any difference.
Hi Chris,
Do you have the ability to view Flash presentations?
If so, then serial/sequences are pretty well illustrated here:
http://techdocs.postgresql.org/college/001_sequences/index.php
Hope that helps.
:-)
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
--
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: