Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data
| От | Joe Conway |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3D6FB58C.4010501@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data
|
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Matthew T. OConnor wrote: > One thought is to use a completely separate database, but also allow it > to be stored in the current database if the user wants it too. This > also solves the case of a user that can't create a new database for his > admin tool (permissions etc...). Also, it might be cleaner now that we > have schemea support to create one pgadmin, or pgaccess schemea in the > database, that handled all the others. > As someone else mentioned (I think), even using a separate schema is not always an acceptable option. If you are using a "packaged" application (whether commercial or open source), you usually don't want *any* changes to the vendor provided database. Particularly with commercial software, that can mean loss of, or problems with, technical support, or problems when upgrading. Joe
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: