Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, seems we have not come to a decision yet on this.
> 
> Do we have agreement to increate FUNC_MAX_ARGS to 32?
> 
> NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3.  At this point, we better decide
> which one we prefer.
> 
> The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage.  If we go to
> 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> problems.

I guess I'd also agree with:  FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32  NAMEDATALEN 64
and work on the performance issues for 7.4.

Joe