Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christopher Kings-Lynne
Тема Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Дата
Msg-id 20020811173841.N67113-100000@houston.familyhealth.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Список pgsql-hackers
> > NAMEDATALEN will be 64 or 128 in 7.3.  At this point, we better decide
> > which one we prefer.
> >
> > The conservative approach would be to go for 64 and perhaps increase it
> > again in 7.4 after we get feedback and real-world usage.  If we go to
> > 128, we will have trouble decreasing it if there are performance
> > problems.
>
> I guess I'd also agree with:
>    FUNC_MAX_ARGS 32
>    NAMEDATALEN 64
> and work on the performance issues for 7.4.

I agree too.

Chris




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_reset() weirdness
Следующее
От: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: python patch