Re: Small fix for _equalValue()
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Small fix for _equalValue() |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3C879A41.C16B564C@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Small fix for _equalValue() (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Small fix for _equalValue()
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
> > If this should be done differently I'm happy for suggestions...
> I think DEFAULT should probably be represented by a NULL, not by
> a Value node containing a null string pointer.
> I'm willing to do the work if no one else feels strongly about it ;-)
OK. I can't think of a case where we would want to represent multiple
DEFAULT placeholders in the context of SET.
Or if we are going to pick up on the recent proposal to allow
column-specific DEFAULT values perhaps we should use a common
representation for the solution here?
In either case, I won't feel stepped on if you implement the solution,
but I can do so if desired.
- Thomas
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: