Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> Or if we are going to pick up on the recent proposal to allow
> column-specific DEFAULT values perhaps we should use a common
> representation for the solution here?
Huh? I recall someone working to allow expressions for type-specific
default values, but I didn't think anything was happening for columns.
> In either case, I won't feel stepped on if you implement the solution,
> but I can do so if desired.
Your choice ...
regards, tom lane