Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Palle Girgensohn
Тема Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU
Дата
Msg-id 3C44968DF3CD8138D379192A@rambutan.pingpong.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

--On måndag, augusti 22, 2005 10.12.11 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> writes:
>> <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
>>> How is FreeBSD's Unicode support broken?  I was not aware of that.
>
>> FreeBSD has no unicode collation support. Hence the need for ICU.
>
> Well, this obviously doesn't bother anyone who uses FreeBSD, so it need
> not bother us either.  I do not feel a need to take on ICU in order to
> implement features that are not present anywhere else on the platform.

It bothered me enough to patch postgresql. :)  And I use it with Java,
which has working unicode support, soo... Oh well, I can live with that -
I'll maintain my patch locally for the time beeing, if that's what's
required.

/Palle



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Win32 unicode vs ICU
Следующее
От: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Sleep functions