Re: Large number of partitions of a table

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Large number of partitions of a table
Дата
Msg-id 3992395.1642431512@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Large number of partitions of a table  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Large number of partitions of a table  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes:
> On 1/16/22 11:38 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>> so no query should ever have to use more than 1 partition.

> I find it hard to believe that you'll *never* run a report against more 
> customers than are in a single partition.

Yeah, I'm a little suspicious of that.  The other thing I'd be worried
about, given that the OP is using v13, is that UPDATE/DELETE planning
performance can be pretty awful with lots of partitions.  There were
some O(N^2) behaviors in there that we didn't get rid of till v14.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large number of partitions of a table
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Large number of partitions of a table