On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Would it then be added as an alias for := for named function parameters? Or would that come still later?
>
> Once we do that, it will be impossible not merely deprecated to use =>
> as an operator name. I think that has to wait at least another release
> cycle or two past where we're using it ourselves.
Okay. I kind of like := so there's no rush AFAIC. :-)
David