Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Дата
Msg-id 39488064.CCEC0EEE@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Michael Robinson <robinson@netrinsics.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> >The issue is that some people felt we shouldn't be performing such
> >checks, and some did.
> Well, more precisely, the issue was stalemated at "one person felt we
> should perform such checks" and "one person (who, incidentally, wrote 
> the code) felt we shouldn't".
> I was just hoping to encourage more people to examine the problem, so 
> that we might get a consensus one way or the other.

I hope that the issue is clearer once we have a trial implementation to
play with.
                  - Thomas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adriaan Joubert
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: New alpha spinlock code passes regression test
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Big 7.1 open items