Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Robinson
Тема Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Дата
Msg-id 200006150452.MAA04005@netrinsics.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Big 7.1 open items  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>The issue is that some people felt we shouldn't be performing such
>checks, and some did.

Well, more precisely, the issue was stalemated at "one person felt we 
should perform such checks" and "one person (who, incidentally, wrote the
code) felt we shouldn't".

Obviously, as it stands, the issue is going nowhere.

I was just hoping to encourage more people to examine the problem, so that
we might get a consensus one way or the other.
-Michael Robinson



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: JanWieck@t-online.de (Jan Wieck)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Big 7.1 open items
Следующее
От: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Big 7.1 open items