Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Дата
Msg-id 38fc499a-ae52-efb6-aad6-82f812d6782d@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2020-09-09 15:38, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> and a few
>>> more calls of int8_numeric that could be converted.  I think the
>>> attached updated version is committable, and I'd recommend going
>>> ahead with that regardless of the rest of this.  I hadn't realized
>>> how many random calls of int8_numeric and int4_numeric we'd grown,
>>> but there are a lot, so this is nice cleanup.
> 
>> Yes, please go ahead with it.
> 
> It's your patch, I figured you'd want to commit it.

ok done

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SIGQUIT handling, redux