Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Дата
Msg-id 1893468.1599658711@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-09-07 01:46, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I reviewed the 0002 patch, finding one bug (in int8_sum)

> Ouch, no test coverage.  Should we perhaps remove this function, since 
> it's obsolete and unused?

I don't feel a need to.

>> and a few
>> more calls of int8_numeric that could be converted.  I think the
>> attached updated version is committable, and I'd recommend going
>> ahead with that regardless of the rest of this.  I hadn't realized
>> how many random calls of int8_numeric and int4_numeric we'd grown,
>> but there are a lot, so this is nice cleanup.

> Yes, please go ahead with it.

It's your patch, I figured you'd want to commit it.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Minor cleanup of partbounds.c
Следующее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Online checksums verification in the backend