Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors
От
Jeff Frost
Тема
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors
Дата
Msg-id
38FCBCD9-0145-4CCD-8A9A-496E532F0AAE@pgexperts.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>
Re: BUG #15299: relation does not exist errors Jeff Frost <jeff@pgexperts.com>
On Jul 26, 2018, at 12:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Jeff Frost writes: >> On Jul 26, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> My first thought would be something to do with a restrictive search_path. > >> Good thought. As far as I can tell we never change it from the default and everything in that DB is in the public schema. > > Right, but what I'm half-theorizing is that the patches for CVE-2018-1058 > affected you somehow. Maybe something "transiently" installed pg_catalog > (only) as search_path and forgot to remove it again. It would be easy > to explain it that way if the errors had been coming out of autovacuum > worker processes, for instance, though your log didn't match that exactly. > > If you see it again it would be a good idea to look very closely at what > happened right before the errors started. Oh, I see what you're saying. Don't the autovacuum processes connect to their own backends which then exit after they're complete though? I have the logs around, so if you know what I should look for, I'd be happy to dig.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Soni M
Дата: