Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com> writes:
> >>>> Any suggestions on how I might handle this?
> >>
> >> Er ... run 7.0beta ?
>
> > Based on recent threads on this list, I have the
> > impression that 7.0beta is not quite ready for production.
>
> A fair objection, since in fact it isn't. [snip] However, if the
> alternative is continuing to get bit by a 6.5 bug, it seems to me that
> being an early adopter of 7.0 is not such a bad choice.
Agreed, if that is in fact my only alternative. Fortunately, this
showstopper bug shows up infrequently (it's been a month or two since
the last bite). I'm still hoping to avoid the bleeding edge on this
production system.
Is there any reasonably straight-forward means to allowing additional
queries within the same transaction after I get an ERROR?
Regards,
Ed Loehr