Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 389DA2A0.EC14B8D3@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | psql -e and -n flags (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags
Re: [HACKERS] psql -e and -n flags |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The suggestion I have is to offer the traditional behaviour with a single
> -e flag, so there's little change for anyone switching from <7.0, and the
> "full" echo mode with two -e flags. I'd then change the flags in the
> regression drivers to -e -e. Comments? Better ideas?
Hmm. imho having a *count* of switch options being significant is the
wrong way to go. It gets in the way of things like
# alias ps psql -e
# ps -e postgres
where someone has defined a "convenience" alias for everyone and
someone else uses it later. Also, it is a style of switch invocation
not appearing elsewhere afaik.
I'd suggest a switch style like "-ee" or "-eb" (backend) or "-ev"
(verbatim) or ??? Comments?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: