Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results (460%improvement)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results (460%improvement)
Дата
Msg-id 38847a3b-49ec-3c56-06fc-63956be9daca@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results (460%improvement)
Re: [HACKERS] Faster methods for getting SPI results (460% improvement)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 4/6/17 03:50, Craig Ringer wrote:
> But otherwise, pending docs changes, I think it's ready for committer.

My opinion is still that this is ultimately the wrong approach.  The
right fix for performance issues in PL/Python is to change PL/Python not
to materialize the list of tuples.  Now with this change we would be
moving from two result materializations to one, but I think we are
keeping the wrong one.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate usage of tablespace location?
Следующее
От: Keith Fiske
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Adding support for Default partition in partitioning