Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 38834477.B9037F62@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] TODO list (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] TODO list
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> The official SQL data types are "timestamp" and
> "interval", right? Everything else will eventually be an alias or
> phased out or whatever?
No (at least I haven't proposed that). abstime stays as a 4-byte
internal system time type. timestamp and interval become full-featured
date/time types, stealing all of the datetime and timespan code, and
the latter two become synonyms for timestamp and interval.
> I've been itching to change the pg_shadow.valuntil column to timestamp
> anyway, I suppose that would be a step in the right direction, or not?
At the moment, there are *no* 8-byte date/time types in the system
tables. This would be the first instance of that, and I'm not sure we
should introduce it in just one place.
Has abstime been a problem here?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: