Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution
Дата
Msg-id 37CB7E7A.A65A45E0@alumni.caltech.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution  ("Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> I have had a request to add multi-byte support to the Debian binary
> packages of PostgreSQL.
> Since I live in England, I have personally no need of this and therefore
> have little understanding of the implications.
> If I change the packages to use multi-byte support, (UNICODE (UTF-8) is
> suggested as the default), will there be any detrimental effects on the
> fairly large parts of the world that don't need it?  Should I try to
> provide two different packages, one with and one without MB support?

Probably. The downside to having MB support is reduced performance and
perhaps functionality. If you don't need it, don't build it...
                    - Thomas

-- 
Thomas Lockhart                lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance
Следующее
От: yutaka tanida
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees