Re: [HACKERS] New man pages
| От | Thomas Lockhart |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] New man pages |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 37AEE198.FB80A1B0@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение |
| Ответ на | New man pages (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] New man pages
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> There's only a little thing that I would like to recall your attention;
> I see whenever the name Postgres instead of
> PostgreSQL. Is there a reason to continue to call it Postgres in the
> docs ?
I have chosen to use "Postgres" within the docs, as a shorter (and
pronouncable ;) form of our product. "PostgreSQL" appears in all
titles and introductory material. I have considered the "SQL" part of
the "PostgreSQL" as sort of a version or branch, like "OpenIngres" or
"Windows 2000", and a bit cumbersome in the body of the docs.
But that was a choice which can always be reconsidered, we're just a
"sed" away from a different name...
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: