Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
| От | Uncle George |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3798514B.5581E6D4@voicenet.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha
Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha |
| Список | pgsql-ports |
Thanks,
But I think that a computer has no right to any "damn order" it
wants to, particular if its the same src & test facilities.
gat
shutup HAL, you will get you're chance to talk to these guys later.
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > The SELECT * FROM shoe_ready WHERE total_avail >= 2;
> > first give a sh3, and then a sh1.
> > BTW this appears to work on the redhat/i386 port . SO where has my
> > alpha gone wrong :-(
>
> It's not wrong. If there is no explicit order-by, your system is
> entitled to return results in any damn order it wants to. The result
> as a set is quite correct (barring other unreported troubles)...
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: