Thanks,
But I think that a computer has no right to any "damn order" it
wants to, particular if its the same src & test facilities.
gat
shutup HAL, you will get you're chance to talk to these guys later.
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > The SELECT * FROM shoe_ready WHERE total_avail >= 2;
> > first give a sh3, and then a sh1.
> > BTW this appears to work on the redhat/i386 port . SO where has my
> > alpha gone wrong :-(
>
> It's not wrong. If there is no explicit order-by, your system is
> entitled to return results in any damn order it wants to. The result
> as a set is quite correct (barring other unreported troubles)...