Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit
| От | Mikhail Terekhov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 377FCC9B.40043452@emc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
As a matter of fact, VACUUM works just fine in my case. It is VACUUM ANALYSE which doesn't. Regards, Mikhail Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >> Can someone tell me what the maximum tuple length is? > > I had always thought that the limit was supposed to be BLCKSZ less > overhead. > > > Here is what I found with the new code. Seems it works. > > test=> vacuum; > > VACUUM > > Wasn't the complaint that started this thread something about "peculiar > behavior" of VACUUM with big tuples? Might be wise to check VACUUM more > closely. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: